<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wild Hogs Review: $38 million? Seriously?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.screenhead.com/reviews/wild-hogs-review-38-million-seriously/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.screenhead.com/reviews/wild-hogs-review-38-million-seriously/</link>
	<description>So much in love with movies, it&#039;s Awesome!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 20:45:05 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Let Studio 60 Die &#187; ScreenHead</title>
		<link>http://www.screenhead.com/reviews/wild-hogs-review-38-million-seriously/comment-page-1/#comment-2671</link>
		<dc:creator>Let Studio 60 Die &#187; ScreenHead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 17:55:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://qs1039.pair.com/tamborin/screen/?p=3270#comment-2671</guid>
		<description>[...] to stay alive, and though we could blame the viewing public at large (the same public that made Wild Hogs into a runaway hit), I have a creeping feeling that they may just be right. Studio 60 needs to be [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to stay alive, and though we could blame the viewing public at large (the same public that made Wild Hogs into a runaway hit), I have a creeping feeling that they may just be right. Studio 60 needs to be [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles</title>
		<link>http://www.screenhead.com/reviews/wild-hogs-review-38-million-seriously/comment-page-1/#comment-2670</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2007 02:33:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://qs1039.pair.com/tamborin/screen/?p=3270#comment-2670</guid>
		<description>This movie is great. It was the funniest I&#039;ve seen in years. Judging by the laughter from the theater audience I was in, they would agree.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This movie is great. It was the funniest I&#8217;ve seen in years. Judging by the laughter from the theater audience I was in, they would agree.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: List of Wild Hogs reviews</title>
		<link>http://www.screenhead.com/reviews/wild-hogs-review-38-million-seriously/comment-page-1/#comment-2669</link>
		<dc:creator>List of Wild Hogs reviews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 14:30:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://qs1039.pair.com/tamborin/screen/?p=3270#comment-2669</guid>
		<description>[...] Screenhead.com &#8220;What I saw wasâ€¦ bland. Seriously, this movie puts tofu to shame.&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Screenhead.com &#8220;What I saw wasâ€¦ bland. Seriously, this movie puts tofu to shame.&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt McCarty</title>
		<link>http://www.screenhead.com/reviews/wild-hogs-review-38-million-seriously/comment-page-1/#comment-2668</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt McCarty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 13:36:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://qs1039.pair.com/tamborin/screen/?p=3270#comment-2668</guid>
		<description>The audienceâ€™s standards are not high at all. I wouldn&#039;t even call their standards low. I wouldn&#039;t even call them &quot;standards.&quot;

I hope Zodiac does not have a 50% dropoff in the box-office next week. Fincher needs to look bankable to these studios, so they give free reign on these types of projects.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The audienceâ€™s standards are not high at all. I wouldn&#8217;t even call their standards low. I wouldn&#8217;t even call them &#8220;standards.&#8221;</p>
<p>I hope Zodiac does not have a 50% dropoff in the box-office next week. Fincher needs to look bankable to these studios, so they give free reign on these types of projects.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
