The Golden Compass Went South- But Why?
December 12th, 2007 in Book-to-Movie, Box Office, Directors, Movies, The Debate

New Line faced a disaster last weekend at the box office, with The Golden Compass only making about 25million on the US box office. As a comparison, The first Chronicles of Narnia film opened to 65mil two years ago, The Fellowship of the Ring opened to 47mil, and even last month’s Bee Movie opened with 38mil. For a movie that cost about 180mil to make (and that excludes the 50 or so it took to market and distribute), 25million suddenly feels rather pathetic, especially when New Line and independent speculators were expecting almost double that. So what went wrong? Below is a few possibilities.
Those Damn(ing) Christians
It’s no secret that a certain Catholic League went out of their way to stop people from watching the film. For those unaware of the film’s plot, the antagonists are known as the Magisterium, who control the world that the film is set in, and are hatching a dastardly scheme to not just control everyone in their world, but also everyone in every other dimension too. There are similarities between the Magisterium and the Catholic Church around the time of the counter-reformation. And while the movie does not draw any direct links between our Catholic Church, the Catholic League feels that the film will prompt kids to read the books, which are more overtly anti-religious. To be honest, it’s a pretty laughable line of reasoning. Surely a true Catholic would not feel the need to have to bully people into not watching a fantasy movie, using negativity to spread their word. It’s ironic that they are using a dogmatic approach to counter a portrayal of religion as dogmatic.
Nevertheless, the Catholic League’s endeavours seemed to have been mildly successful. While their protests may have actually generated more interest for an adult film, when it comes to kids flicks, Catholic parents seemed to have erred on the side of caution. Movie forums are littered with tales of kids and teens who were banned from watching the film by their parents. It’s a scary notion that such a group can have such an affect on the public, and this success will certainly give the Catholic League the confidence to denounce plenty of other films too in an aim to keep their flock from straying.
Genre Exhaustion
In America, the fantasy film was never truly bankable. There are a few exceptions, such as the Lord of the Rings films, or the Narnia film, but they were based on highly popular books. Variety claim that the Golden Compass book wasn’t that popular in the US in the first place. Last year saw Eragon fail to impress the box office (opening with a similar figure to The Golden Compass), and earlier this year Stardust, despite its impressive cast, only managed to make 38 million in total, in the US. The Seeker was another non-starter, opening to 3million. It seems as if the fantasy movie has been exhausted, and people are getting tired of the same old adventure (not a good omen for the forthcoming The Spiderwick Chronicles). Variety have said that fantasy usually fares better outside of the US, so perhaps The Golden Compass may not be a global disaster.
Bad Reviews
Currently, The Golden Compass has a rating of 43% in Rotten Tomatoes, 51% in Metacritic, and a User Rating of 6.7 in IMDB. These are all pretty pathetic ratings for such a high-concept film. Yet what power does a critic have over a fantasy movie? Bee Movie has similar ratings and that has already passed 120million in the US (The Golden Compass will barely pass 80), and Spiderman 3 wasn’t well received at all, and that made 336million in the US alone. I’m sure glowing reviews would have helped, but mediocre ones would hardly stop a kid.
Bad Cast
Nicole Kidman is box-office poison at the moment. Earlier this year she starred in The Invasion, a sci-fi horror film that was a box-office disaster worldwide. It also happened to start Daniel Craig, both of which lead the cast of The Golden Compass. Perhaps people were reminded of the Invasion when they saw the line-up. Then again, Elijah Wood was barely known until after Lord of the Rings.
Bad Weekend
There seems to be a bit of a lull between Thanksgiving and Christmas time in the US. The weekend before last saw only one new release, Awake, which didn’t fare very well. This time last year saw Apocalypto leading the box office with a mere 15 million. Is the weekend just a little too early to cash in on the Christmas excitement? Sure, Narnia opened that week two years ago, but that seems to be the exception.
Bad Directing/Marketing
While all of the factors above probably contributed in some way to dampen the success of The Golden Compass, I personally think that director Chris Weitz is quite responsible for this film’s misfire. Weitz has directed About A Boy and American Pie before this, hardly films that are of an epic nature. In fact, Weitz’s utter lack of visual panache or ability to generate excitement through a sense of adventure is disappointingly evident throughout the entire movie. The film uses the old “hero is about to be killed but at the last second is saved by an ally†device four times in a row, making the action scenes rather bland. Characters appear and disappear in the movie having little valid reason to be there (while the witches are important in the books, they acted as a mere deus ex machina in the film). And the endless introduction of characters ends up shifting focus away from the central character, that of Lyra. It feels as if Weitz liked the book so much that he was afraid to take a risk and simply chop off a few characters and scenes that confused the narrative.
The Golden Compass is possibly one of the best fantasies ever written, taking a little girl’s journey and eventually taking her into a war between all of heaven and hell, like a cross between Lord of the Rings and Paradise Lost, with a dash of sci-fi for flavour. But Weitz seems lost, unable to highlight the unique aspects of this fantasy, so much so that he cast two of fantasy’s most recognisable actors, Ian McKellan (Lord Of the Rings) as the polar bear Ioruk, and Christopher Lee (Lord of the Rings, the new Star Wars trilogy) as a member of the Magistratum. This lack of vision is also evident in the film’s conclusion. The book ends with Lyra braving a leap into a parallel universe, after suffering a huge betrayal. The film ends with her off to rescue a character that remains incidental in the movie. If Weitz had an inkling of adventure, he would have ended this film by alluding to this world, our world. For example, ending with a shot of our world, and showing a rift emerge, would have instantly aroused the audience’s attention. It would have shown a link between the fantasy we have just watched and our world, combining the two, making the film more real and closer, and instilling anticipation in the audience to discover what happens next. The cliff-hanger that The Golden Compass actually ends on is rather dull.
This ties into the marketing of the film. With Weitz unable to highlight the distinct qualities of the film, how are New Line able to market the film as something different. Sure, there are witches, duelling polar bears, and humans with animals for souls, but the trailers presented the film as another typical adventure into an unknown land with the aid of some magical device. It does little to bring out the conspiratorial element of the film, or the huge scale of the character’s actions. How could the audience not be unimpressed?
A Trilogy Without Sequels?
There’s plenty of debate at the moment as to what will happen with the His Dark Materials series. There is a chance the film won’t come close to making back its production costs, and if so, there would be no sense in making Part 2 and Part 3. Which would be a shame, because the second and third novels are far more mind-blowing and expansive than the first.
All hope is not lost, though, and the rest of the world has to see the film. It appears that The Golden Compass has already made 55million outside of the US, a figure much higher than Eragon, which went on to make 174 million outside of the US.
A bigger concern is if the sequels are greenlit, will Weitz continue to direct them?
Popularity: 1% [?]
Stumble it! / Bookmark:



December 12th, 2007 at 10:46 am
The biggest problem with this movie is with the scenario. They tried to cram every detail and much story in a 1h30 movie. The result is a fast paced movie and a sense of detachment from the characters. We simply don’t give a damn about them.
Too much in too little time. Kind of like the opposite of the LOTR trilogy…. (too little in WAYyyyy too lengthy
)
December 12th, 2007 at 12:00 pm
Good points. I have seen this done in other movies as well; where the character is lost in epic proportions.
I am sure, however, that the DVD will give the movie justice as all films deserve.
December 12th, 2007 at 1:23 pm
Here in Spain, the movie just arrive to the Cinemas.
I think I still go and watch it. I’ll Give it a chance, anyway.
If Catholics don’t like the movie, don’t go and watch it!
What happened to “live and let live”?
Saludos.
December 12th, 2007 at 2:44 pm
Good point, Kenna,
I think New Line aren’t too scared as they’ll probably make a lot on DVD- I suspect those conservative Catholics who were afraid to be seen going to the movie in public may sneak a rental in the privacy of their homes.
Brem, yes, you’ve pretty much nailed it- too many characters, too little Character.
December 12th, 2007 at 3:40 pm
Right on — live and let live — it’s just a movie to enjoy!
December 12th, 2007 at 10:28 pm
[...] on 12 Dec 2007 at 10:28 pm | Tagged as: Uncategorized Screenhead.Com has an article titled “The Golden Compass Went South- But Why?” - which tries to pinpoint the reasons for the film’s poor box office showing in the [...]
December 12th, 2007 at 11:20 pm
The Daily Wrap Up - Dec 12th, 2007…
GameTap Goes Mac The Golden Compass Went South- But Why? Digital Photo Frames declared best gifts by Retrevo Sixeart mini speaker……
December 13th, 2007 at 6:13 am
The Catholic Church never espoused a “Live and let live” dogma. That isn’t in their nature. Also, you might want to edit your article. It isn’t the “Magistatum” but is the “Magisterium.” Not a big deal but I figured I would point it out.
I am really curious to see how well it does overseas. While a “cult” hit in the US, I think the book “Northern Lights” (as it is called outside the US…did they change the movie name over there, too?) is much more well read in a world more agnostic than our own fundamentalist shores.
I am disappointed in our young generation, though. Remember when someone telling you “no! don’t see that!” would prompt kids to do it, just to spite authority!
But, maybe they are merely good moviegoers who know a bad movie when they read about it. I saw it opening night (having loved all the novels) and would agree that while it has some nice performances (the girl for one but Kidman for another) it is a rushed, sloppy and poorly written movie.
Maybe a sequel would change that if they do it a) cheaper (and if you read the second book, that could be done…less wintery stuff going on) and b) with more artistry. I think movies with genuine art to them like LOTR will do better than hack jobs like this and The Seeker.
December 13th, 2007 at 11:11 am
“I think the book “Northern Lights†(as it is called outside the US…did they change the movie name over there, too?)”
In Spain is called the same (in spanish obviously XD) The Book: “Las luces del Norte”. The movie: “La brújula dorada”.
*Free spanish lessons in Screenhead…XD
December 13th, 2007 at 11:17 am
Thanks for the lesson, Moriarty!
In the UK the book was called Northern Lights, but the film is called The Golden Compass. I guess New Line thought people may associate it with Lord of the Rings in a positive way. They were wrong.
December 13th, 2007 at 4:29 pm
Nice entry Eion
Stumbled it
December 19th, 2007 at 2:09 pm
I am not a Catholic and I am certainly no fan of the Catholic church; but I chose not to pay money for a film based on a one of three books whose purported purpose is to sell atheism to our children. As a student of philosophy and religion I am perfectly okay with people making informed judgments concerning their religion, philosophy or epistemic system. What I don’t like is someone trying to subvert this process. Children who view this watered-down, benign movie will want to buy and read the more potent books.
December 19th, 2007 at 3:51 pm
“purported purpose”
Purported by whom exactly ?
December 19th, 2007 at 4:31 pm
Good point Michael- I think it is unfair to reduce this movie to just a simple attempt to promote athiesm. This is a fantasy story…. there are of course undercurrents of anti-religious-establishments. But they are not told in a childish way. They do of course indirectly accuse religion of limiting our personal freedom and expression- something which is hard to deny, you must agree, being a student of philosophy and religion. But fear not, a child who reads these books are not going to suddenly turn athiest and threaten to murder anyone from the relgiious community.
The books/films may given a slight voice of athiesm, but is that such a problem? Shouldn’t athiesm have a voice as much as religion does? Nobody criticises religion for dogmatically shoving its ideas down children’s throats, and the books and films don’t even come close to that.
December 19th, 2007 at 9:04 pm
The purported purpose according to the author of the books is to promote atheism.
December 20th, 2007 at 2:47 am
If that was his sole purpose, then surely he would have written a philosophical text. That’s like saying the Naria books’ purpose is to promote Christianity. Pullman is trying to tell a story, it’s as simple as that. Yes, his story has elements of things he believes in, but all stories have that.
December 20th, 2007 at 8:07 am
Your argument is with Pullman not with me
December 20th, 2007 at 8:17 am
No, it’s not. You’re the one saying that Pullman’s book’s purpose is to promote athiesm. I am saying that it is not. Let me quote him: “As for the atheism, it doesn’t matter to me whether people believe in God or not, so I’m not promoting anything of that sort,”.
December 20th, 2007 at 8:30 am
Pullman said that not me. I just repeated what he said.
December 20th, 2007 at 10:16 am
If my quote is incorrect, I would concede your point.
December 26th, 2007 at 11:39 am
The reason the movie is failing and will bomb is pretty simple: the message of atheism is hopelessness, and during the Christmas season everyone wants to believe in something. The marketing team would have done better to release it in the dead of winter, with all of the holiday cheer gone; perhaps the cold and empty atheistic message would have come across a bit more effectively.
December 27th, 2007 at 7:16 am
Ah, but Neil-o, it’s not like the film was being marketed as an athiesm film, not even remotely. Only those clued into the Catholic League’s denouncements would really know about that.
And on a side-note, being an athiest isn’t about being hopeless. It’s about placing all your energy and belief into this life, the only life we can be certain about, and appreciating it to the fullest extent possible. The His Dark Materials novels, despite the outcome, ends on a very beautiful note.
July 31st, 2008 at 1:34 am
[...] Goes Mac The Golden Compass Went South- But Why? Digital Photo Frames declared best gifts by Retrevo Sixeart mini speaker Related PostsThe Daily [...]