I Think I Smell a Rat

June 16th, 2007 in Animation, Movie News, Movies, The Movie Biz

505333ratatouille-posters.jpg

Is it just me or does Pixar seem to have lost its footing? The last few movies I have to see I have been subjected to the trailer of. ‘Ratatouille’ To these eyes the movie looks awful. Its not that am anti-Pixar either. It just seems to me that the last two offerings ‘Cars’ and ‘Ratatouille’ have given me reasons to doubt the state of the art studio.

‘The Incredibles’, ‘Finding Nemo’, and the ‘Toy Story’ movies all provided some of the best family movies of all time with their incredible graphics and timeless story lines. Although I didn’t have much interest in either ‘A Bug’s Life’ or ‘Monsters, Inc’ (both of which I saw on DVD) I understood their allure.

I have not seen ‘Cars’ but probably will sometime in the near future because of Paul Newman alone. I will probably hold my nose when I pop it in. This brings us to ‘Ratatouille’. The movie about a cooking rat (in John McEnroe’s words: “You Cannot be Serious”) is hitting theaters on June 29th. Does anyone have a real desire to see this film? Maybe I am wrong and it will be a return to form for the studio but I am going on record that I am skeptic of this movie from the get go.

Popularity: 1% [?]

Stumble it! / Bookmark:Add 'I Think I Smell a Rat' to Del.icio.us Add 'I Think I Smell a Rat' to digg Add 'I Think I Smell a Rat' to FURL Add 'I Think I Smell a Rat' to blinklist Add 'I Think I Smell a Rat' to My-Tuts Add 'I Think I Smell a Rat' to reddit Add 'I Think I Smell a Rat' to Feed Me Links! Add 'I Think I Smell a Rat' to Technorati Add 'I Think I Smell a Rat' to Yahoo My Web Add 'I Think I Smell a Rat' to Newsvine 

(14 Comments)
  1. fil Says:

    Wow, TWO reviews of movies you haven’t seen in one post! Amazing! Pixar, you fear, is losing its edge because the last two movies (that you haven’t seen) must be bad because…you haven’t seen them? I really don’t understand.

    I was hesitant about CARS simply because the early teasers made it out to be a movie catering to the NASCAR crowd and that is a “sport” I really have little interest in. But when I saw it, I found I really enjoyed the story, the characters and finally the message (which is, essentially, slow down and enjoy the scenery).

    Again, with RATATOUILLE, I am not jazzed about the actual concept (a rat that cooks? meh) but then I saw the 9 minutes teaser that was posted on Disney’s website and I realized the boys at Pixar have done it again. They just don’t do bad movies.

    It was odd to read a cynical post like this since the poster clearly admitted not seeing either movie that is complaining about. Pretty weak, even for the ‘blogosphere.

  2. Frank the Movie Guy Says:

    That is the whole point. I didn’t see ‘Cars’ because the concept was so out of touch with what I would see at the theater. If you remember, Disney stock got slaughtered due the enormous expecatations of the film. When the goals of the film, which did well by most films standards, failed to meet the wild hype surrounding the stock tanked.

    My point is that Pixar isn’t making films for just your average every day movie-goer anymore. And I think that is going to hurt the company unless they come up with something like ‘The Incredibles’ (which caters as much to Adults as kids) or else they will turn into just another movie studio and not the “unique” entity it once was..

  3. Matt Says:

    Well, Frank the “Movies I Haven’t Seen” Guy…if that is your whole point…then your whole point makes you an idiot. Please repost when your opinion is informed and not ignorant and retarded.

    PS: I hated the movie Cars.

  4. fil Says:

    Frank, I have no idea what you are talking about. “The Incredibles” was significantly more niche than “Cars” and by being a fairly tough PG vs. safer G meant it was even more likely to miss out on the target audience that you speak of, namely the “average” viewer. Granted, The Incredibles was an awesome movie, not only my favorite Pixar but one of my all time favorites of all films. Cars was not, but was still a very good movie that I enjoyed as much as my 6 year old did.

    But you will never win a “quality” argument using box-office returns. Some of my favorite movies didn’t make much money. Movies that are horrible sometimes make a lot of money. But to say Pixar is losing it because they didn’t reach the high water mark of Incredibles or Nemo is silly. I actually do watch movies that I don’t necessarily like or think I will like and can speak about it a bit more than you can. And I can safely say that Pixar hasn’t done crap like Over the Hedge, Shrek 3, Madagascar, etc. Their material will outlast all of those because to watch a Pixar movie you don’t need to know who the current bands/celebrities/movies of the day are to enjoy them. Timeless classics, all. I think Ratatouille, by the same guys who made Incredibles, has a good chance of being as good as their other material. Maybe not Incredibles or Nemo but certainly not the crap the other CG studios put out each year.

    But Matt is right…if you want to call yourself “The Movie Guy” and not “Heard about a Movie Guy” then you really ought to watch the movies you review. If you want more people to read you and take you seriously, that is.

  5. Frank the Movie Guy Says:

    It is the job for a studio to make films people are dying to see. Pixar was once the best at that. Now they are just “another studio”. What don’t you get about that?

  6. mekki Says:

    Well, I was dragged to a Ratatoullie early preview by a friend yesterday. I say “dragged” because the last two Pixar films left me empty. The Incredibles was overrated. I found the secondary characters, Edna and Frozone way more interesting and dynamic than any of the leads who were your basic stock characters. Cars….”Life is a highway”…..yeah…I was cringing throughout the movie. So, you could see why I wouldn’t want to see the new Pixar film.

    But I watched it and it was brilliant. The Pixar people did their homework and I left this film craving really good food. The characters were fully fleshed out whether they were human or rat. The plot was very creative. Yes, there was a cliche romance but luckily, that wasn’t one of the main plot points. And, my word, the rats were cute. Throughout the film you could hear girls squealing, “So, cute!” The voice acting was top notch. The animation was amazing. Paris in the hands of Pixar looked magical. Peter O’Toole practically stole the film as a grim food critic who looked like he stepped out The Triplettes de Belleville.
    And the music! No bad pop songs instead we got a soundtrack filled with Parisian cafe music. It was lovely.

    So, give it a try. I want to see it again.

  7. THE MOVIE SCORECARD Says:

    The Rat appears to be okay from the trailers. Plus you can’t expect a studio to have all wonderful movies so even if it does stink they are sort of due. Pixar has been blessed with a great track record.

  8. Mary M Says:

    I have to agree with you Frank. What could be more unpalatable than a movie about a rat cooking in a kitchen? I saw the trailer and thought “what was Pixar thinking?” The kids with me were not impressed with the trailer either.

  9. fil Says:

    …or what about a penguin…that surfs! Or vegetarian shark! Or a clown fish that isn’t funny! Or a monster afraid of little children! A ghost that is afraid of the dark! C’mon, the oddly juxtaposed characters and situations are a staple of storytelling, especially in children’s films. That’s what creates the tension in films. Yeesh.

    On the other hand, it took Frank posting nonsense out of his booty to get people to comment a lot so I expect his non-view review technique to crop up again in the near future. Look for early non-reviews of Transformers (”What is Michael Bay thinking?”), Stardust (”What is Neil Gaimen thinking?”) and Live Free or Die Hard (”What is…” Well, I might agree with a non-view review of this one…though the awesome Timothy Olyphant in it makes it a draw for me. Call me conflicted).

  10. MediaJolt Says:

    Frank’s “haven’t seen it, but I don’t like it anyway” attitude reminds me of the religious groups in years past (and to come) who, as a matter of kneejerk reflex, slammed countless good movies with religious themes for being offensive, blasphemous, whatever, before the movie even made it to the theaters. “Last Temptation of Christ,” “Dogma,” and even “DaVinci Code” were all recipients of this mindset. See the movie then give us your opinion. Otherwise, add a disclaimer that specifies that you are basing your critique on a preview or series of previews and NOT the actual movie. Tell me something about how your mind works - do you see every black person you’re about to encounter on the street as a potential gang member out to bust a cap in your ass?

  11. mekki Says:

    MediaJolt - “Tell me something about how your mind works - do you see every black person you’re about to encounter on the street as a potential gang member out to bust a cap in your ass?”

    Whiskey Tango Foxtrot did that come from? Put down the apple, we’re talking about oranges here.

  12. MediaJolt Says:

    mekki, it’s about Frank’s mindset - basing his “insights” on immediate first impressions - because he didn’t like the last one, he assumes he won’t like the next one, just on appearances alone.

  13. mekki Says:

    Again, I say “what?” I understand about mindset but to imply that he is racist based on the fact that he makes judgments on movies he hasn’t seen is…….God, I don’t think there’s a word in the English language to describe how farfetched and ironic that is.

    That’s it. I am going to look for a word. I am sure the Germans have one.

    Be back in five.

  14. Frank the Movie Guy Says:

    Thanks for coming to my defense, mekki. I think that was a bit harsh myself.

Post Comment

Please Note bad behaviour, will ban your from posting in future. Please respect everyones comments.