<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cannes to Feature Surveillance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.screenhead.com/reviews/cannes-to-feature-surveillance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.screenhead.com/reviews/cannes-to-feature-surveillance/</link>
	<description>So much in love with movies, it&#039;s Awesome!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 01:42:18 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Alexi</title>
		<link>http://www.screenhead.com/reviews/cannes-to-feature-surveillance/comment-page-1/#comment-7660</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 13:47:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.screenhead.com/reviews/cannes-to-feature-surveillance/#comment-7660</guid>
		<description>How I wish that there were a way to score a rating on a blog such as this one. It would surely rank far below a 3.8. 

You might, if you wish to be taken as seriously as you take yourself, learn how to spell. A class in punctuation at the Learning Annex would also be in order. And it&#039;s reassuring to know that talent owes nothing to heredity. That at least absolves your forebears.  Still, they must be so proud of you down at the sty.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How I wish that there were a way to score a rating on a blog such as this one. It would surely rank far below a 3.8. </p>
<p>You might, if you wish to be taken as seriously as you take yourself, learn how to spell. A class in punctuation at the Learning Annex would also be in order. And it&#8217;s reassuring to know that talent owes nothing to heredity. That at least absolves your forebears.  Still, they must be so proud of you down at the sty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eoin ofaolain</title>
		<link>http://www.screenhead.com/reviews/cannes-to-feature-surveillance/comment-page-1/#comment-7442</link>
		<dc:creator>eoin ofaolain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 11:55:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.screenhead.com/reviews/cannes-to-feature-surveillance/#comment-7442</guid>
		<description>Er... okay, care to elaborate? The onyl info I took from IMDB was the score of Boxing Helena, which is a general indicator of how unpopular the film was. That, and it&#039;s poor box office performance. 

As for the plot, I took that from other sources, and of course from the trailer. My opinion of the film is of course taken from the trailer. It&#039;s supposed to sell as movie, and it doesn&#039;t do its job very well. I dont&#039; make any comment about the film itself, and if you paid attention, the closest I get is saying &quot;It looks like&quot;, not, &quot;It is&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Er&#8230; okay, care to elaborate? The onyl info I took from IMDB was the score of Boxing Helena, which is a general indicator of how unpopular the film was. That, and it&#8217;s poor box office performance. </p>
<p>As for the plot, I took that from other sources, and of course from the trailer. My opinion of the film is of course taken from the trailer. It&#8217;s supposed to sell as movie, and it doesn&#8217;t do its job very well. I dont&#8217; make any comment about the film itself, and if you paid attention, the closest I get is saying &#8220;It looks like&#8221;, not, &#8220;It is&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: worldtraveler1</title>
		<link>http://www.screenhead.com/reviews/cannes-to-feature-surveillance/comment-page-1/#comment-7384</link>
		<dc:creator>worldtraveler1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 00:13:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.screenhead.com/reviews/cannes-to-feature-surveillance/#comment-7384</guid>
		<description>It is clear that the person who wrote this review is a young, inexperienced beginner that is not well informed and definetly mis-lead about the film industry.  First of all anyone who quotes anything from IMDB or uses it as a credible source is lost from the get-go.  It is a private site that has no affiliation with anything whatsoever and is loaded with innaccurate information.  How could someone talk so horribly about a film they never even saw and expect people to listen or take them seriously?  Good luck youngin...Find a towel and dry your ears.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is clear that the person who wrote this review is a young, inexperienced beginner that is not well informed and definetly mis-lead about the film industry.  First of all anyone who quotes anything from IMDB or uses it as a credible source is lost from the get-go.  It is a private site that has no affiliation with anything whatsoever and is loaded with innaccurate information.  How could someone talk so horribly about a film they never even saw and expect people to listen or take them seriously?  Good luck youngin&#8230;Find a towel and dry your ears.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
